Guest ColumnRetrofit: The mathematics of IPL – Is it ‘ghaate ka sauda’ for the new owners of Pune and Kochi teams?
Over the last couple of days, the IPL auction has emerged as the hot button subject. Sandeep Bamzai does the math and says that the stiff entry cost is the biggest impediment in the grandiose designs of the new team owners of Pune and Kochi teams. Despite the pie having been made more lucrative by Lalit Modi, there isn’t enough on the table to take away for the newbies. But the early birds have definitely got the worm.

Over the last couple of days, the IPL auction has emerged as the hot button subject. Just about everyone has an opinion on it. There are others who are extremely cynical about the entire thing. But what one can run away from, but not hide, is that it is a raving success. For team owners, sponsors, advertisers, broadcasters, viewers, spectators; the IPL economy has a buzz about it. More so because it is back home. Many people have called me and asked me whether Sahara Adventure and Rendezvous have paid too much for the new franchises? Yes, maybe they have, given that Emerging Media (Rajasthan Royals) coughed up $67 million for 10 years three summers ago. Let me do the math for you. At $67 million, the franchise is a steal, for it works out to $6.7 million per year. If you adjust that for today's exchange rate, it is Rs 29.82 crore. Shah Rukh Khan also paid a relatively small sum of money in Season 1 - $75.09 million. Can you make money, well that is the question dominating everyone's mindspace these days? At $370 million, this is the way it breaks down for Sahara. It has to basically fork out $37 million per year. Now that is a lot more than $6.7 million per annum. How do the franchises make money is then the million dollar question. Simple.
The franchise owners are subsidised by the Cricket Board and its extension IPL. This is the way it works: Broadcast revenues for one were subsidising the franchises till the end of Season 2, but in Season 3, Lalit Modi has shown his worth as a marketer. He has worked his numbers in such a way that by clinching a panoply of new deals, he has managed to double the central revenue pool. Each franchise owner was given Rs 67.5 crore from this pool in year 2. But with the catalogue of new deals - YouTube, Colors, Karbonn, Maxx, MRF, vRock, et al; Modi has managed to make this particular revenue stream closer to Rs 130 crore for each team owner. Now, believe me that is a Godsent. So, if Rajasthan Royals has to pay a fixed cost of $6.7 million only and in turn is getting Rs 130 crore from the central revenue pool, then that is a positive start. There are other revenue streams that open up when you play in India, which I will detail in a bit. Of course, there is the operating expenses part, which is equally heavy, but if you are smart and some of these franchises are, then there is no way you can lose money. Entry cost is critical, the lower the better. That way the arithmetic is in the black and not in the red. People who bought the franchises earlier and cheap stand to benefit. But even Mukesh Ambani, who paid the most – $111.9 million or approximately Rs 447 crore – forks out only Rs 44.7 crore as franchise fee annually to BCCI.
What are the major heads that one needs to look at? Revenues and expenses obviously. Under revenues there is - broadcasting rights now read central revenue pool, team sponsors, other income which is gate receipts, in stadia advertising, merchandising sales, media tie-ups and prize money. Under expenses there is - franchise fee, stadia fees, team eco-system expenses, which include sales and marketing employee cost as well as players and support staff payments, team promotion, travel and hospitality cost and other variable expenses. Team sponsorship is also going gangbuster in 2010 and the general average is expected to be closer to Rs 40 crore for each team with Mumbai Indians and KKR leading the way with Rs 50 crore or thereabouts. This is up from an average of Rs 24 crore last year. By making a connect with different social strata, IPL has proved to be a killer application. Another novel concept this time is the in stadia big screen advertising during the games. A very innovative revenue stream. Last year, with the tournament shifting to South Africa, logic suggested that the team owners lost money, but IIFL research said otherwise. I must add that several clubs were given additional handouts by IPL reimbursing them for hospitality and travel expenses incurred in South Africa. While some of these figures are in public domain, others have not been quantified.
What Lalit Modi has done in Season 3 is show us how to skin the cat in at least a dozen new ways. Take the ITV deal for UK broadcast rights, again slice and dice. Ditto for the deal with UFO Moviez, which gave them theatrical rights for the IPL and paved the way for multiplexes to show the matches. Though this has proved to be a damp squib, another revenue stream was added by Modi. Fragmenting and slicing the rights pie, which rested with IPL and Modi have been monetised efficiently. For Season 2, IIFL suggested that each one of the eight sides reportedly made profits, which is a considerable improvement over Season 1 when only Rajasthan Royals, Kolkata Knight Riders and Chennai Super Kings made a profit. And this was contrary to popular perception, which said that all the teams would lose money because the event was staged in South Africa. But the figures revealed a different story. The broadcasting revenues were directed to a central pool, 40 per cent of which went to IPL itself, 54 per cent to franchisees and 6 per cent as prize money. The money will be distributed in these proportions until 2017, after which the share of IPL will be 50 per cent, franchisees 45 per cent and prize money 5 per cent.
IPL signed up Kingfisher Airlines as the official umpire partner for the series in a Rs 1.06 billion deal. DLF coughed up Rs 200 million as title sponsor for five years, while Pepsi paid $12.5 million to become the beverage partner. Of this, $2.5 million went to the eight franchise owners every year. Last season, Rajasthan Royals made a profit of Rs 351 million, while KKR made a profit of Rs 258 million; Kings XI Punjab, Rs 261 million. In 2008, it is believed that teams like Kolkata Knight Riders, Mumbai Indians and Delhi Daredevils earned around Rs 20 crore from ticket sales alone as the capacity of their home stadia was larger. With ticket prices going up, KKR (Eden Gardens), MI (DY Patil stadium), DD (Ferozshah Kotla) are expected to earn in excess of Rs 25 crore this year from gate receipts. According to the report by equity research firm IIFL, Team Jaipur made the highest profit of Rs 35.1 crore in the group matches of the second edition of the tournament. Jaipur had also made the second-highest profit of Rs 14.50 crore in 2008, including the Rs 4.50 crore ($1 million) prize money.
Throw in the prize money sweepstakes and though they don't compare with T20 Champions League, they are sizeable. The winner's purse in 2010 is a hefty Rs 4.8 crore, Rs 2.4 crore for the runners-up and Rs 1.2 crore each for the losing semi-finalists. For those who didn’t get past the league stage, the sums earlier were much smaller - Rs 80 lakh for the team that finished fifth (Kings XI Punjab), Rs 70 lakh for the sixth placed (Jaipur), Rs 50 lakh for the seventh (Mumbai Indians) and Rs 40 lakh for the wooden spooners. The healthy bottomlines are a happy change from Season 1, when besides Knight Riders and Jaipur, Chennai Super Kings crawled into the black due to the Rs 2.4 crore prize money for ending up as the losing finalists. As franchise owners begin to get the hang of the way the system works, the money machine will also chug along nicely. The problem though is for the new franchise owners, who will have to bear the cross of a much higher entry cost - Kochi at $33.33 million (Rs 148.3 crore) and Pune at $37 million per annum (Rs 164.6 crore) For these two new franchises, it could well be like Sisyphus as he attempts to roll the boulder up the mountain. Sisyphus, King of Corinth, was given an assignment to roll a great boulder to the top of a hill. Only, every time Sisyphus, by the greatest of exertion and toil, attained the summit, the darn thing rolled back down again.
So, could be the fate of the new team owners. For the stiff entry cost is the biggest impediment in their grandiose design. Despite the pie having been made more lucrative by Modi, there isn't enough on the table to take away for the newbies. But the early birds have definitely got the worm. And perhaps the cream as well. As they say in Hindi - kya yeh ghaate ka sauda hai? Time will tell?
Here is the break-up for each franchise in season 2. I would like to add a caveat here that though an equity research firm has put out these numbers, one still needs to take them with a pinch of salt:
(Profit/Loss - (Rs Million)
Mumbai Indians
a. Broadcasting Rights – 675b. Team Sponsors - 240
c. other income - 140
d. prize money - 5
Total Revenues (a+b+c) – 1060
a. Franchise Fees - 515b. Team Expenses - 200
c. other expenses - 275
Total Expenses (a+b+c) - 990
Net profit - 70
Royal Challengers Bangalore
a. Broadcasting Rights - 675b. Team Sponsors - 240
c. other income - 135
d. prize money - 22.5
Total Revenues (a+b+c) - 1072.5
a. Franchise Fees - 516b. Team Expenses - 200
c. other expenses - 275
Total Expenses (a+b+c) - 991
Net profit - 81.5
Deccan Chargers
a. Broadcasting Rights - 675b. Team Sponsors - 240
c. other income - 135
d. prize money - 45
Total Revenues (a+b+c) - 1095
a. Franchise Fees - 492b. Team Expenses - 200
c. other expenses - 255
Total Expenses (a+b+c) - 947
Net profit - 148
Chennai Superkings
a. Broadcasting Rights - 675b. Team Sponsors - 240
c. other income - 185
d. prize money - 12
Total Revenues (a+b+c) - 1112
a. Franchise Fees - 419b. Team Expenses - 200
c. other expenses - 275
Total Expenses (a+b+c) - 894
Net profit - 218
Delhi Daredevils
a. Broadcasting Rights - 675b. Team Sponsors - 240
c. other income - 147
d. prize money - 12
Total Revenues (a+b+c) - 1074
a. Franchise Fees - 386b. Team Expenses - 200
c. other expenses - 255
Total Expenses (a+b+c) - 841
Net profit - 233
Kings Xi Punjab
a. Broadcasting Rights - 675b. Team Sponsors - 240
c. other income - 143
d. prize money - 8
Total Revenues (a+b+c) - 1066
a. Franchise Fees - 350b. Team Expenses - 200
c. other expenses - 255
Total Expenses (a+b+c) - 805
Net profit - 261
Kolkata Knight Riders
a. Broadcasting Rights - 675b. Team Sponsors - 240
c. other income - 189
d. prize money - 4
Total Revenues (a+b+c) - 1108
a. Franchise Fees - 345b. Team Expenses - 200
c. other expenses - 305
Total Expenses (a+b+c) - 850
Net profit - 258
Rajasthan Royals
a. Broadcasting Rights - 675b. Team Sponsors - 240
c. other income - 142
d. prize money - 7
Total Revenues (a+b+c) - 1064
a. Franchise Fees - 308b. Team Expenses - 200
c. other expenses - 205
Total Expenses (a+b+c) - 713
Net profit - 351
All figures are in Rs Million
Other incomes include gate receipts, in-stadia advertising, merchandise sales, and media tie-ups
Other expenses include stadia fees, travel, stay cost and team promotion
Source: IIFL Research
(Sandeep Bamzai is a well-known journalist, who started his career as a stringer with The Statesman in Kolkata in 1984. He has held senior editorial positions in some of the biggest media houses in three different cities - Kolkata, Mumbai and New Delhi. In late 2008, he joined three old friends to launch a start-up – Sportzpower Network – which combines his two passions of business and sport. Familiar with all four media – print, television, Internet and radio, Bamzai is the author of three different books on cricket and Kashmir.
The views expressed here are of the writer’s and not those of the editors and publisher of exchange4media.com.)
Read more news about (internet advertising India, internet advertising, advertising India, digital advertising India, media advertising India)
For more updates, be socially connected with us onInstagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook Youtube & Whatsapp
You May Also Like
HT Media posts Consolidated Total Revenue of Rs 580 crore in Q2
Chairperson and Editorial Director Shobhana Bhartia says due to lower commodity prices and control on costs there has been an improvement in operating profit
HT Media has posted a Consolidated Total Revenue for Q2, 2020 at Rs 580 crore.
As per a statement released by the company, EBITDA for Q2’20 increased by 139%, and margins at 14% vis-à-vis 6% in previous year. This has been driven by softening of newsprint prices and continued focus on cost.
The Net Cash position at a consolidated level continues to be strong.
The Print ad revenue has declined due to sluggish volumes, even as yields have improved. National advertising continues to be soft, although local advertising witnessed growth.
Savings in raw material costs have driven improvement in EBITDA margins.
Chairperson and Editorial Director Shobhana Bhartia said, “Slowing economic growth has hit advertising spends in key categories, putting pressure on revenues across the media industry. As a result, our Print and Radio (on like to like basis) businesses saw revenues dip as compared to a year-ago. However, thanks to lower commodity prices and a tight control on costs, we saw an improvement in our operating profit. On the digital front, Shine, our online recruitment portal has shown good progress and continues to grow. Our outlook for the coming quarter remains cautious, given overall economic sentiment and macroeconomic trends. Cost-control and falling commodity prices should help protect our margins.”
Read more news about (internet advertising India, internet advertising, advertising India, digital advertising India, media advertising India)
For more updates, be socially connected with us onInstagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook Youtube & Whatsapp
ABP Group posts Rs 15.70 crore as net profit in Q1 FY20
The group’s total operating income stands at Rs 365.55 crore
ABP Group has posted a net profit of Rs 15.70 crore in the first quarter of FY20, as per media reports.
The group’s total operating income stands at Rs 365.55 crore.
It’s net profit for the fiscal ended March 31, 2019, was down 68% to Rs 31.90 crore compared to the previous fiscal.
The Profit Before Interest Lease Depreciation and Tax (PBILDT) has also dropped 53.52% to Rs 107.12 crore.
The group has six news channels - ABP News (Hindi), ABP Ananda (Bengali) ABP Majha (Marathi) and ABP Asmita (Gujarati), ABP Sanjha (Punjabi) and ABP Ganga (Hindi).
Read more news about (internet advertising India, internet advertising, advertising India, digital advertising India, media advertising India)
For more updates, be socially connected with us onInstagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook Youtube & Whatsapp
Zee Media posts consolidated revenue of Rs 137.03 crore for Q2 FY20
ZMCL has recorded 4.4% growth in operating revenue for first half of FY20
Zee Media Corporation Ltd (ZMCL) has posted a 4.4 per cent growth in operating revenue to Rs 337.6 crore in the first half of FY20, as per media reports.
It has reported a consolidated revenue of Rs 137.03 crore for Q2 FY20.
In a statement, ZMCL has said: “During the quarter, the network expanded its footprint s into Southern India through the launch of Zee Hindustan in Tamil and Telugu languages. This is intended to make the network's content accessible to wider audience.”
The operating expenditure in Q2FY20 has dropped by 21.7 per cent.
The statement further said: “EBITDA for HlFY20 improved by 34.1 per cent to Rs 1,029 million from Rs 767.5 million EBITDA for H1FY19, while the same declined by 9.4 per cent to Rs 370.2 million from Rs 408.7 million for the corresponding period last financial year. EBITDA Margin grew from 23.7 per cent in H1FY19 to 30.5 per cent in HlFY20, while growing from 24.2 per cent in Q2FY19 to 27 per cent in Q2FY20.”
Read more news about (internet advertising India, internet advertising, advertising India, digital advertising India, media advertising India)
For more updates, be socially connected with us onInstagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook Youtube & Whatsapp
No slowdown here: In-cinema ad rates up by at least 50% for 3 big Diwali releases
Housefull 4, Made In China and Saand Ki Aankh ready to hit the silver screen this week, with the hopes of giving brands the eyeballs they look for in theatres
It’s that time of the year again when theatres gear up to pocket maximum gains. Diwali is here and there are three films ready to hit the silver screen this week--Housefull 4, Made In China and Saand Ki Aankh. The festive period brings much joy to exhibitors, distributors and theatre owners because it ensures footfalls, giving brands the eyeballs they look for. In fact, industry experts don’t feel that economic slowdown this year has impacted in-cinema advertising. While they are concerned about three movies clashing during Diwali, they predict 50-100 per cent rise in ad rates during this period.
Advertising moolah
Mohan Umrotkar, CEO, Carnival Cinemas, is expecting 60-70 per cent surge in advertisement topline compared to last year. “Going by the buzz and advance booking for these three releases, market is bullish. Advertisers have blocked most of the advt-slots during the festival period. Housefull 4, Made In China and Saand Ki Aankh all combined together should generate around Rs 350 crore topline at the box office during the festival week. We are expecting 60-70 per cent surge in the advertisement topline from last year. Also, this year we have added around 14 per cent new advertisers, and 4 per cent of them are first-time cinema advertisers,” he says.
But according to Siddharth Bhardwaj, Chief Marketing Officer - Head of Enterprise Sales, UFO Moviez, things have changed a lot in the last couple of years. “Since some films have not really lived up to their expectation, advertisers are spreading the spends all through the year. They are picking up far more number of titles in the year rather than focusing only on Diwali or Eid.”
“It is good for the industry because you can monetise the inventories beyond just big weeks. A lot of content- driven films have come up which has given us the opportunity to monetise more markets. It has put lesser pressure on Diwali. Most of the cinemas are sold out for Diwali. It becomes difficult to accommodate everything,” Bharadwaj opines. He also reveals that for this week, the inventories are already full.
Diwali ad rates
Experts reveal that ad rates differ from property to property and depends on location as well. But Diwali surely sees a massive hike in rates. This year, theatre owners are expecting 100 per cent rise in ad rates. While Umrotkar revealed that for Diwali, they are charging 100 per cent higher than the regular card rates, Girish Johar, trade analyst and film producer, shared that even the rates for putting up kiosks of brands go up during festivals like Diwali.
“It’s based on property. On a ballpark, ad rates double up. So if you are putting up a kiosk, they charge say Rs 50,000-25,000 for a month. During Diwali, they charge almost double because of the kind of footfalls theatres witness,” Johar revealed.
Economic slowdown? Not for Cinema!
This year, brands have been pulling back their spends on other mediums due to economic slowdown, but cinema seems unaffected. Calling entertainment business recession-proof, Johar explains, “If you see the other side, box office is up by 15-20 per cent. Yes, it is a bit subdued because the brands are in a wait-and- watch scenario. They are increasing their focus around consumption rather than awareness.”
Bharadwaj too seconded it by saying, “These are challenging times but our medium is very efficient. If you see economy has slowed down, but the cinema has grown instead.”
Clash cover
Three movies are clashing this Diwali which means shared screens and box office gains.
“It’s never good for us when two or more big-ticket films release together. If they would have come on different dates, there are chances that more advertisers will take advt. inventory in those weeks separately instead of that one particular week,” shares Umrotkar.
Read more news about (internet advertising India, internet advertising, advertising India, digital advertising India, media advertising India)
For more updates, be socially connected with us onInstagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook Youtube & Whatsapp
INOX Leisure Ltd sees 42% growth in total revenue
Profit After Tax up 327% to Rs 51 crore
INOX Leisure Ltd (INOX) has reported financials for the second quarter ending September 2019.
Its total revenue has risen to Rs 524 crore with a 42% growth from Rs 369 crore in the corresponding quarter in FY19. Its EBITDA has more than doubled to Rs 107 crore with a 121% growth, while the PAT stood at an impressive Rs 51 crore, up 327% from previous year’s second quarter.
Siddharth Jain, Director, INOX Group, said: “At INOX, setting new benchmarks is now a routine, thanks to our consistently sharp focus on luxury, service and technology and our uncompromised desire to offer our patrons, nothing but the latest and the best! We are delighted with our remarkable consistency on all parameters, and we are sure about maintaining the momentum and focus on innovativeness. Content once again proved that why we term it as the ‘hero’. Thanks to the creators of such spellbinding movies, which keep inviting our guests to our properties, and allowing us to pamper them with our signature hospitality. With the launch of Megaplex, we are delighted to further our endeavor of developing experience-driven cinema destinations of global standards, and we will continue to do so. On behalf of Team INOX, I assure all our stakeholders that we will continue to break barriers and exceed all expectations.”
Read more news about (internet advertising India, internet advertising, advertising India, digital advertising India, media advertising India)
For more updates, be socially connected with us onInstagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook Youtube & Whatsapp
Hathway Cable & Datacom reports 100% subscription collection efficiency in Q2
The broadband subscriber base has increased from the previous quarter’s 840,000 to 860,000
Hathway Cable and Datacom has reported subscription collection efficiency at 100%, and the broadband subscriber base has increased from previous quarter’s 840,000 to 860,000 in quarter ending September, as per media reports.
It has narrowed its consolidated net loss by 74% and the operating EBITDA has been reported 15% up to Rs 107.5 crore compared to Rs 93.1 crore a quarter ago.
The total income has dropped 2%, while the expenditure is down 6%.
In the financial results, the company has said the FTTH markets are leading growth in customer acquisition.
Read more news about (internet advertising India, internet advertising, advertising India, digital advertising India, media advertising India)
For more updates, be socially connected with us onInstagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook Youtube & Whatsapp
ZEEL posts 7.4% YoY growth in total revenue for Q2 FY20
ZEEL's domestic advertising revenue has grown 1.4% YoY in Q2FY20
Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (ZEEL) has reported a consolidated revenue of Rs 2,122 crore for the second quarter of FY20, recording a growth of 7.4% on YoY basis.
The Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) was recorded as Rs 692.9 crore with an EBITDA margin of 32.7%. PAT for the quarter was Rs 413.2 crore. The Profit After Tax (PAT) for the quarter was Rs 413.2 million, with a growth of 6.9% YoY.
During the second quarter, ZEEL’s consolidated advertising revenue grew by 1.2% YoY to Rs 1,224.7 crore. The domestic advertising revenues grew by 1.4% YoY to Rs 1169 crore.
ZEEL has posted 26.8% YoY growth in Q2FY20 domestic subscription revenue. ZEEL’s consolidated subscription revenue grew by 19.0% to Rs 723.5 crore during the quarter.
ZEEL’s total expenditure in Q2FY20 stood at Rs 1429.1 crore, higher by 9.9% YoY compared to Q2FY19.
While ZEE5 recorded a peak DAU (Daily Active User) base of 8.9 million in September 2019, ZEE5 users watched an average of 120 minutes of content on the platform in the same month.
During Q2 FY20, the television network had an all-India viewership share of 18.4%.
During the quarter, ZEEL’s international business revenue was Rs 208.2 crore. The advertising and subscription revenues for international business declined by 4.0% YoY and 21.5% YoY, respectively.
Zee Music Company has registered 7.1 billion views on YouTube in Q2.
Punit Goenka, Managing Director and CEO, ZEEL, said, “I am pleased with the performance we have exhibited during the quarter. Our entertainment portfolio continues to grow from strength to strength across all formats and maintained its leading position. Our television network has emerged stronger post the implementation of tariff order on the back of a strong customer connect and brand pull of its channels. ZEE5 continued to gain traction across audience segments and markets, driven by its compelling content library and expanding list of partnerships across the digital eco-system. This strong operating performance allowed us to deliver industry leading growth in both advertising and subscription despite the tough macro-economic environment. Domestic subscription growth of 27% has reaffirmed the value proposition our television network has built over the years. The impact of tariff order has now largely settled down and has brought increased transparency along with improved monetization. Our domestic advertising revenue growth, though significantly lower than historical trend, is higher than the industry growth. We have witnessed an improvement in ad spends through the quarter and we believe that the onset of festive season along with measures taken by the government will help revive the consumption growth.”
Read more news about (internet advertising India, internet advertising, advertising India, digital advertising India, media advertising India)
For more updates, be socially connected with us onInstagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook Youtube & Whatsapp